Freedom Of Information Act- Requests Filed

I filed FOIA’s in January of 2008 (with the CIA, FBI and Dept. of Justice), and had no
response for months. I initially thought this to be a good sign.  Previous experience filing
FOIA’s has taught me that an agency taking a long time means there’s some there there
(and probably some redactions to perform on documents). However, the complete lack of
response compelled me to file again.

Exhibit 11a shows some examples of the FOIA letter generator used as an on-line
application.  



Exhibit 11b shows an example of the second set sent recently, to the CIA, FBI, and DOJ
respectively.  You’ll notice that I’ve listed my own name among the requested search terms,
so that I can never be accused of performing a less-than-transparent process of research
for public advocacy.



The FOIA’s, while varying slightly, were as follows:

Dr. S. Rorke
(
Address, phone number, and full name included on original document )

September 2, 2008

Information and Privacy Coordinator
Central Intelligence Agency
Washington, DC 20505

FOIA REQUEST
Fee waiver requested
Expedited review requested

Dear FOI Officer:

Pursuant to the federal Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552, I request access to and
copies of any materials referencing: Metascience Foundation, Inc.; George Meek (its
former president); Mark Macy (claiming rights to Metascience at present, and since the
expiration of George Meek has been acting as gatekeeper of Metascience findings,
withholding primary source documentation from Metascience that was intended by its
founder, George Meek, to be of public record and availability) and Dr. Patricia Kubis (a
Macy affiliate through co-authorship); William (Bill) O’Neil (died September 4, 1991 in
Pennsylvania, where he resided from at least the late 1970’s on), Hans Heckman, Erland
Babcock, Thomas Pratt of Florida (legitimate president of Metascience Foundation, Inc.
since ); and Jim McDonnell of the McDonnell Foundation (granted monies to Metascience).
Author John G. Fuller, and his wife Elizabeth Fuller, are of interest, as is Dr. George J.
Mueller (aka George Jefferis [sic] Mueller) who died May 31, 1967 in Orange County,
California, the Spiricom project and the Mark IV device written about by Fuller in his book
“The Ghost of 29 Megacycles”. The time period would range mainly from 1976-1985,
however materials on George Mueller might begin as early as 1927, while materials related
to Metascience Foundation, Inc., others involved and Mark Macy will be more
contemporary. Dr. George Jefferis (or Jeffries) Mueller was a colleague of Dr. Pat Kubis,
when they served contemporaneously at Orange Coast Community College, CA from 1964-
1967, and is the same individual purportedly contacted via Spiricom technology
intermittently from 1980-1983, as reported by Meek & O’Neil (culminating in a press
conference at the Washington Press Club on April 6, 1982) and Macy & Kubis (culminating
in a series of books beginning in 1996 dealing with the claims of technological-mediumship
- and in Macy’s case, radio appearances, many books and videos for sale, paid
appearances to speak and present his ‘evidence’).  Andrija Puharich (died January 3,
1995), while listed nearly last, is of high interest. Dr. Puharich, a parapsychological
researcher (with an association to SRI by way of a fringe intelligence gathering process
called ‘remote viewing’), inventor and author known to have US intelligence ties and a
known associate of the infamous Ira Einhorn, the famous Uri Gellar, and the less well-known
Jack Sarfatti. Thus, Einhorn and Sarfatti are of interest as well. To make Puharich’s
significance and relationship relevant to others in this request: Puharich’s research
included studying the influence of extremely low frequency ELF electromagnetic wave
emissions on the mind, with resultant psychotronic technology patents (both US and
foreign). Puharich was an associate of Meek, who collaborated with O’Neil on Spiricom
with Metascience funding, which was primarily derived from McDonnell Foundation grant
monies, which project yielded the Spiricom results, which has been, and continues to be
popularized by Mark Macy as a means of monetary gain.  Lastly, in the interest of full
disclosure and transparency of the process, please include my name (Stephen James
Rorke, aka Stephen Rorke, Steven Rorke and Steve Rorke) among the request for
materials, pursuant to the federal Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552.

I would like to receive the information in electronic format (high-resolution pdf's sent to my
email address)

Please waive any applicable fees. Release of the information requested is in the public
interest because it will contribute significantly to public understanding of government
operations and activities, particularly regarding the Puharich-Meek-O’Neil-Macy
connection, and will serve the public interest. This information will become part of a publicly
available study on auditory apophenia (i.e., the spontaneous perception of connections and
meaningfulness of unrelated phenomena), visual pareidolia (i.e., a type of misperception
involving an obscure stimulus being perceived as something clear and meaningful),
anomalistic psychology as a study of ‘magical thinking’ (i.e., a belief in the
interconnectedness of all things through forces and powers that transcend both physical
and spiritual connections), gatekeeping of information and manipulation of the public mind
as the foundation of myth-building. This information will be used to further study the
mythology that underpins the field of ITC (Instrumental TransCommunication) and
‘paranormal studies’ in general, the profit-motive and motivation in general for its
leadership and adherents, and explore the more contemporary funding of studies dealing
with survival of personality after death (through grants) in a transparent and legitimate way
that contributes to the public understanding. Ultimately, a government (or third-party)
psychological operations model to explain the evidence gathered by Metascience and the
perpetuation of the Spiricom story will be employed.

If my request is denied in whole or part, I ask that you justify all deletions by reference to
specific exemptions of the act. I will also expect you to release all segregable portions of
otherwise exempt material. I, of course, reserve the right to appeal your decision to withhold
any information or to deny a waiver of fees.

As I am making this request as a scholar and public-interest advocate, and this information
is of timely value, I would appreciate your communicating with me by telephone, rather than
by mail, if you have questions regarding this request.

Please provide expedited review of this request which concerns matters of urgency. As a
scholar, I am primarily engaged in disseminating information. The public has an urgent
need for information about psychological operations- or ‘psyops’ and disinformation-
because certain individuals in the ‘paranormal’ field perpetuating the Spiricom story as
reality are potentially perpetrating fraud in the inducement upon an unsuspecting public
interested in ITC research and the survival of personality after death. The Spiricom project,
as conducted by the Metascience Foundation, Inc., claimed to have proof of real-time, two-
way communication with deceased individuals using a device called the Spiricom Mark IV
(essentially a side-band radio, later modified to include a transmitter, receiver and tone
generator) operated by (ventriloquist and self-proclaimed medium) Bill O’Neil.  This project,
and its dissemination at the popular level, contained/contains an element of
government/third-party psychological operations and/or disinformation, I contend. These
claims are perpetuated and capitalized upon by said gatekeeper through the sale of books,
lectures, appearances, multimedia presentations on audio tape and compact disc, vhs and
dvd (all promoted via www.worlditc.org and affiliated sites), and people seeking answers to
matters of survival of personality after death are fleeced by the perpetuators of the
aforementioned Spiricom ‘evidence’. This matter is made all the more time-sensitive by the
fact that the results of this FOIA search might sooner challenge those responsible for fraud
in the inducement, and the fact that many of the central figures are elderly, whose expiration
makes involvement in my efforts of study and public-interest advocacy impossible. I certify
that my statements concerning the need for expedited review are true and correct to the
best of my knowledge and belief.

I look forward to your reply within 20 business days, as the statute requires.

Thank you for your assistance.

Sincerely,

Dr. S. Rorke
11a. FOI letter generator .....................................
11b. FOIA EXAMPLE redacted- CIA-FBI .........
11a.
11b.